March 4, 2012


Saturday, March 3, 2012

The Sandra Fluke Condom Fund: Help a Georgetown Law Student Who Likes to Screw!


Feeling sorry for Sandra Fluke that she can't slut it up with every guy she wants on the Georgetown campus because she can't afford birth control, I have decided I wanted to help. I am proud to announce BBCW has entered the world or organized charity with a brand new non profit we call Condoms for Sandra.

Condoms for Sandra will ensure Sandra Fluke can have sex in a house, she can have sex near a mouse, she can have sex in a box, she can have sex with a fox, she can have sex in a car, she can have sex whereever you are, she can have sex in a tree, as long as she let's the taxpayers be.

She can have sex on a train, and let a guy rub her mane. She can have sex in the dark, even let out a bark. When she get's off the train, she can get laid in the rain. She might want to with a goat, or even on Bill Clinton's boat. Just as long as she doesn't dote--unconstitutional powers that just don't float.

Do make your donation today, so big government doesn't save her day. Send a box of rubbers to this law student who likes to screw.

Send your condom donations to:

President Sandra Fluke
c/o Law Students for Reproductive Justice
1730 Franklin Street - Suite 212
Oakland, CA 94612

Liberal Hypocrisy When it Comes to Using the Word "Slut"

Oh the world is in an uproar. Thirty year old Georgetown law student Sandra Flukes went in front of Congress claiming to have so much sex throughout the year that she can't afford birth control--despite Planned Parenthood, college campuses, and even high schools handing out free condoms and condoms are quite cheap at Walmart. Of course, those on the right had much fun at Flukes' expense as another ugly liberal woman is complaining about getting laid. It's always the ugly liberal woman that try to build their sex lives up to Wilt Chamberlain levels to promote their big government agendas.

In this case, Fluke thinks someone else should pay for her birth control so she can truly live without any responsibilities. She thinks the government should force people to pay for her birth control.

Since the obvious conclusion is she wants something of monetary value for sex, well you can see how easy the jokes came. Of course, as expected the left wing main stream media isn't laughing, but creating all the opportunities in the world to go after conservatives like Rush Limbaugh for suggesting Flukes has so much sex that she might find herself described as a "slut". Oh yes, the left is angry.

Where were these same lefties when David Letterman used the word against a woman.



Keith Olbermann doesn't seem upset over Letterman describing Sarah Palin's look as a "slutty flight attendant". Olbermann asks the question if it was appropriate, and while I haven't watched Olbermann in recent days, I can only imagine he isn't handling Rush Limbaugh's comments nearly as calm as he did in this example. If anything, the above video is Olbermann producing damage control for the liberal Letterman.

You Ain't Gettin' Sandra Fluke's Hot Body Until Someone Else Pays for Her Birth Control


"You aint' gettin' none of this until Barack and Nancy forces someone else to pay for my birth control. Until then, you just get a preview of the goods," Sandra Fluke to her last boyfriend Ralph.
Ralph

Sandra Fluke's Past Shows History of Being a Community Organizer: President of the Law Students for Reproductive Justice.



The community organizer and chief quickly called Sandra Fluke yesterday to make sure she was okay. Fluke is the woman who claims she can't afford birth control although she goes to one of the top schools in the country--Georgetown. It could be Fluke may be an Obama plant to produce good political theater--which means you probably should be watching what Obama is doing as he trots Fluke on the stage in hopes conservatives will take the bait.

Sandra Fluke's past is quite interesting to say the least. She isn't just an average lose woman hoping to enjoy a crazed sex life. Nope, rather she is a woman with a resume of community organizing. See as Democrats try to create theater they got caught in a lie, but this isn't stopping Fluke from talking about suing Rush Limbaugh even though her testimony on the hill suffers credibility based on her age. She posed as a 23 year college student, but records show she is really 30. It her record gets better.

What Congress didn't tell you about was her activist past. Like I said, this isn't an ordinary college woman sexually frustrated because she can't afford birth control the rest of the year. It turns out she is a past president for Law Students for Reproductive Justice. That makes her one of those community agitators just like Obama. Then you have the phone call from Obama yesterday as reported by Andrea Mitchell, and this story gets a whole lot more interesting. This woman had an agenda not being reported by the mainstream media that goes far past wanting affordable birth control.

It doesn't just stop there. The Georgetown Law page highlights more of her activist resume.
click to enlarge

Sandra Fluke’s professional background in domestic violence and human trafficking began with Sanctuary for Families in New York City. There, she launched the agency’s pilot Program Evaluation Initiative. While at Sanctuary, she co-founded the New York Statewide Coalition for Fair Access to Family Court, which after a twenty-year stalemate, successfully advocated for legislation granting access to civil orders of protection for unmarried victims of domestic violence, including LGBTQ victims and teens. Sandra was also a member of the Manhattan Borough President’s Taskforce on Domestic Violence and numerous other New York City and New York State coalitions that successfully advocated for policy improvements impacting victims of domestic violence.

As the 2010 recipient of the Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles Fran Kandel Public Interest Grant, she researched, wrote, and produced an instructional film on how to apply for a domestic violence restraining order in pro per. She has also interned with the Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking; Polaris Project; Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County; Break the Cycle; the Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment and Appeals Project; NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund; Crime Victim and Sexual Assault Services; and the Human Services Coalition of Tompkins County.

Through Georgetown’s clinic programs, Sandra has proposed legislation based on fact-finding in Kenya regarding child trafficking for domestic work, and has represented victims of domestic violence in protection order cases. Sandra is the Development Editor of the Journal of Gender and the Law, and served as the President of Law Students for Reproductive Justice, and the Vice President of the Women’s Legal Alliance. In her first year, she also co-founded a campus committee addressing human trafficking. Cornell University awarded her a B. S. in Policy Analysis & Management, as well as Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies in 2003.


Like I said, this isn't just a woman who can't afford birth control. She is playing the part of a woman who can't afford birth control with a history of community activism geared towards reproductive rights. As she plays this victim, clearly with a driven agenda she is talking about suing Rush Limbaugh for slander.
The Georgetown law student branded a “slut” by Rush Limbaugh may file a lawsuit against the conservative shock jock as he revs up his criticism against the woman who found herself at the center of the contraception coverage debate.

The possibility of a lawsuit, according to the Daily Beast, was first floated by Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) on Friday during a speech at New York Law School.


Perhaps, her testimony should be reviewed from her Congressional hearing to see if she misrepresented herself. If she did, perhaps we should make sure she never makes it to her Bar exam.

Just think, at age thirty, had Sandra Fluke gotten herself a real job rather than moonlight as a Georgetown Law School Student while community agitating, she might be able to afford the $6.47 pack of Trojans at the local Walmart.

Classy Claire...: Claire McCaskill Sends Out E-Mail Titled "Commie Babe Liberal and Slut"

You might want to check your junk e-mail folder if you haven't heard from Claire Mama Caskill in recent days. One might think Claire is pushing pornographic e-mail or adult Web sites in the latest e-mail to come from the Claire for US Senator campaign in Missouri since the E-mail comes with the subject title "Commie Babe Liberal Slut".

Nope, it's an attack against Rush Limbaugh. Obviously Claire thinks she has some Constitutional authority to force people to buy other people contraception. That should be no surprise. She thinks she has Constitutional authority to force you to purchase healthcare insurance through Obamacare citing the General Welfare Clause, and then when someone calls her on it through paid political ad, she points to evil special interest. As if we were going to forget Claire just robbed us from another freedom by pushing for the unconstitutional federal mandate. (If Claire would read Federalist 41, she would see she has taken the General Welfare Clause way out of context.)

Anyway, here's Claire McCaskill's pornographic sounding e-mail. Thankfully it did not contain any naked pictures of the Missouri Senator. I don't think I would have been able to keep my lunch down.

March 3, 2012


Sandra Fluke is not a “slut.” She’s a femme-agogue tool; DCCC, Emily’s list fund-raise off of Rush

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  March 2, 2012 12:32 PM

The Soros monkeys and assorted progressive agitators are using conservative radio giant Rush Limbaugh to raise money again.
This just came in my in-box:
“What does it say about the college co-ed Susan Fluke [sic] who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex — what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute.” — Rush Limbaugh
Michelle –
Rush Limbaugh is reading this e-mail.
Yesterday, while Rush was launching his latest vile attack on women who dare to speak up for our reproductive rights, he mentioned my e-mail to you on Wednesday night. I’ll spare you the details on his latest misogynistic rant, but it’s clear that he thinks he can shame us into silence.
Shockingly, the only ones silent about Rush’s hateful tirade are Congressional Republicans like GOP Leader Eric Cantor. Let’s call them out:
Help us reach 250,000 signatures today on our petition demanding Eric Cantor and House Republicans denounce Rush’s heinous attacks on women >>
Republicans in Congress thought they could silence us by refusing to let Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke testify on their all-male panel on birth control coverage. They were wrong.
Your grassroots response is already making headlines from ABC News to the Huffington Post. As Sandra put it yesterday:
“The millions of American women who have and will continue to speak out in support of women’s health care and access to contraception prove that we will not be silenced.”
Don’t let Republicans in Congress get away with a “no comment” on Rush’s outrageous smears. Either they’re okay with his vile attacks on women or they’re not.
Add your name right now: http://dccc.org/Denounce-Rush
Thanks for standing strong,
Kelly
Kelly Ward
DCCC Political Director
***
Hey, so much for keeping a laser-beam focus on jobs, jobs, jobs, eh?
My two cents: Yes, we’re seeing the usual left-wing double standards when it comes to defending women against sexist putdowns. The language Rush used is completely unacceptable…except when it’s used against the likes of Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, myself, and every other prominent female conservative in public life, of course.
I’ll tell you why Rush was wrong. Young Sandra Fluke of Georgetown Law is not a “slut.” She’s a moocher and a tool of the Nanny State. She’s a poster girl for the rabid Planned Parenthood lobby and its eugenics-inspired foremothers.
Appearing on NBC’s “Today,” Sandra Fluke said she was “stunned” and “outraged” by Limbaugh’s comments, which she deemed “an attempt to silence me, to silence all of us from speaking about the healthcare we need.”
Fluke, a third-year law student, testified about Georgetown’s policy on contraception during an unofficial hearing last Thursday that was led by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). She argued that birth control should be covered by health insurance at religious institutions.
Pelosi arranged for Fluke to testify after she was excluded from an official congressional hearing on the contraceptive mandate in the nation’s health-care law. Republicans who ran the hearing said Fluke’s name was submitted too late (Democrats disagree). None of the women who testified at the congressional hearing spoke in favor of the mandate.
At Pelosi’s hearing, Fluke said her fellow students at Georgetown, a Jesuit university, pay as much as $1,000 a year for birth control because campus health plans do not include coverage of contraceptives for women.
I’ll let Georgetown student Angela Morabito respond best:
Sandra Fluke doesn’t speak for me. Or for Georgetown.
She doesn’t speak for those of us who worked hard to be able to choose to come to a great institution with a great tradition of faith and scholarship. She certainly can’t speak for the Jesuits who dedicated their lives to God and Education with a long established set of rules. There are only ten of them, and Ms. Fluke would do well to give them a quick read.
If she wants a more liberal sex life, she can go to Syracuse. (Syracuse, I must apologize – but we are in March and basketball matters – sorry you got caught up in this.)
Sandra doesn’t even speak for all skanks! She only speaks for the skanks who don’t want to take responsibility for their choices. That’s a tiny group of people. Hey Sandra! How about next Saturday night, you come hang out with me and my gay boyfriends! Your hair will look fabulous and you’ll get to see great musical theatre! Oh, and odds of you getting pregnant? Zero percent.
Even the oh-so-left HuffPo called Sandra out on her media sluttery: ”Fluke got the stage all to herself and was hailed as a hero by the crowd and Democratic lawmakers on the panel, all of whom rushed to appear on camera with her at the end. “Excuse me. I’d love to get a picture with our star,” Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) said as she pushed her way through the packed room to Fluke.”
Star of what? Star of the bedroom sex tape? When did Georgetown Law start admitting Kardashians?
Sandra, we might be on the same campus, but we are not on the same planet.
Sandra told some sob stories about how contraception isn’t covered by the Jesuit institution we attend. (Maybe they don’t cover it because, you know, they’re a Jesuit institution. Religious freedom? Anyone? Bueller?)
A student group called Plan A H*yas for Choice staged a demonstration against the university health plan last year, duct taping their mouths and chaining themselves to the statue of Georgetown’s founder on the university’s front lawn. Then, a funny thing happened – nothing. We left them there. Now Sandra has chained herself to the sinking ship of Pelosi Liberalism. She will always be remembered as a Welfare Condom Queen.
Let’s talk priorities here. It costs over $23,000 for a year at Georgetown Law. Sandra, are you telling us that you can afford that but cannot afford your own contraception? Really? Math was never my strong suit, but something about Sandra’s accounting just doesn’t seem right.
No one forced Sandra to come to Georgetown. And now that she has, Sandra does not have to depend on the university health plan. She could walk down the street to CVS and get some contraception herself. Or, go to an off-campus, non-university doctor and pay for it out of pocket. (Or, you know…maybe not have so much sex that it puts her in financial peril?)
Funny how the same side that cries “Get your rosaries off my ovaries” is the same side saying, “on second thought…please pay for me to have all the sex I want!” The people who espouse “pro-choice” “values” are the same people who say religious institutions have no right to choose.
Yep. Sandra Fluke’s no “slut.” Call her moocher. Tool. Hypocrite. And budding femme-agogue. Won’t be long before she’s Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s new press secretary. Screechy McScreeches of a feather…
***
Who is Sandra Fluke? JWF takes a closer look:
For me the interesting part of the story has the ever evolving “coed”. I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time she was described as a 23 y/o coed. Magically at the same time congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception she appears and is even brought to capitol hill to testify. This morning in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show it was revealed that she is 30 y/o NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.
In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.
***
And now another Rush-bashing fund-raiser has hit my email box:
Dear Friend,
It’s not a big secret: Rush Limbaugh is no friend to women. But this time, he has seriously crossed a line.
By now, you’ve probably heard of Sandra Fluke. She’s the Georgetown Law student who was denied the right to testify in front of the sham, no-women-allowed hearing that Republicans held on access to birth control. I was there when Democrats gave her the chance to testify, and I saw a brave, intelligent, and articulate advocate for women.
So Rush Limbaugh called her “a slut.” And he called her “a prostitute.”
Our pro-choice Democratic women in the House are fighting back against these attacks. They’ve called on their Republican colleagues to — finally — condemn Rush Limbaugh for what he’s said. We want you to join them.
Click here to tell Republicans that it’s time to stand up to Rush Limbaugh and condemn him for his vile and despicable comments about Sandra Fluke and all women.
Rush Limbaugh didn’t stop with the attacks on Sandra Fluke. He offered to buy her and all the women at Georgetown “as much aspirin to put between their knees as they want.”
Make no mistake. People like Rush Limbaugh want to punish each and every one of us for the crime of speaking out on our own behalf. When Rush calls Sandra Fluke “a slut,” he’s calling all of us sluts.
We have a choice. We stand apart silently, or we stand together with voices raised. I choose to be heard, and I hope you join me.
Thank you.
All the best,
Amy K. Dacey
Executive Director
Make sure you receive email updates from EMILY’s List. Add information@emilyslist.org to your approved senders list.
This email was sent to: writemalkin@gmail.com. Click here to unsubscribe from email sent by EMILY’s List.
Contributions or gifts to EMILY’s List or endorsed candidates are not tax deductible.
Design by Plus Three | Powered by ARCOS
Paid for by EMILY’s List www.emilyslist.org and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

What a shock! It was all a BIG PRODUCTION!
The Democrat’s token abused college coed is actually a 30 year-old hardcore women’s rights activist.
Sandra Fluke is also the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.
I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.
In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.
Unreal. This was all just a big dishonest Democrat ploy to take the attention off of Barack Obama’s assault on religious freedom.
It figures.

Sandra Fluke’s Appearance Is No Fluke

Posted by  on Mar 02, 2012 at 10:49 am
For me the interesting part of the story is the ever-evolving “coed”. I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services,  she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old,  NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.
In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.
While she is described as a “third year law student” they always fail to mention that she is also the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.
Does your campus’s LSRJ chapter face opposition in regard to facilitating a comprehensive conversation about reproductive justice? Well mine definitely does! While my campus has a mix of people with different backgrounds, and a rich liberal arts community, the Midwest doesn’t exactly scream bleeding liberal. Some LSRJ chapters at conservative campuses face opposition in the form of other, more conservative, student run organizations; some face it from their administrations, and others from their peers, or the community in general. Whatever the opposition is, it can be incredibly frustrating and disheartening.
The question is, how do we combat this conservative opposition and oppression, in order to facilitate a discussion and educate others about the RJ movement? I am obviously not alone in facing these problems, as Sandra Fluke of Georgetown lead a packed room in a discussionon this question at the first Issue Caucus that I attended at the Leadership Institute, LSRJ’s national conference at Berkeley.
While no solution was definitively reached, and I personally don’t begin to have the “right” answer, I was really charged by the discussion and feel many great ideas were presented. Some campus chapters decided to take an adversarial approach, feeling it important to use those “scary” words the opposition fears.
Further background research on Ms Fluke reveals that she got her start in government in New York in 2009.
Sandra Fluke’s professional background in domestic violence and human trafficking began with Sanctuary for Families in New York City. There, she launched the agency’s pilot Program Evaluation Initiative. While at Sanctuary, she co-founded the New York Statewide Coalition for Fair Access to Family Court, which after a twenty-year stalemate, successfully advocated for legislation granting access to civil orders of protection for unmarried victims of domestic violence, including LGBTQ victims and teens. Sandra was also a member of the Manhattan Borough President’s Taskforce on Domestic Violence and numerous other New York City and New York State coalitions that successfully advocated for policy improvements impacting victims of domestic violence.
As the 2010 recipient of the Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles Fran Kandel Public Interest Grant, she researched, wrote, and produced an instructional film on how to apply for a domestic violence restraining order in pro per. She has also interned with the Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking; Polaris Project; Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County; Break the Cycle; the Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment and Appeals Project; NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund; Crime Victim and Sexual Assault Services; and the Human Services Coalition of Tompkins County.
Through Georgetown’s clinic programs, Sandra has proposed legislation based on fact-finding in Kenya regarding child trafficking for domestic work, and has represented victims of domestic violence in protection order cases. Sandra is the Development Editor of the Journal of Gender and the Law, and served as the President of Law Students for Reproductive Justice, and the Vice President of the Women’s Legal Alliance. In her first year, she also co-founded a campus committee addressing human trafficking. Cornell University awarded her a B. S. in Policy Analysis & Management, as well as Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies in 2003.
My only question is, how does someone go from being a champion of domestic violence issues to an expert of women’s reproductive health issues?

SANDRA FLUKE: A FAKE VICTIM OF GEORGETOWN’S POLICY ON CONTRACEPTIVES?

Since her controversial testimony on February 23, Sandra Fluke has been called many things, from a heroine to a “slut,” but actually, she may just be a fake. Gateway Pundit and Hot Air suggest that may be the case, with citations to a post by Jammie Wearing Fools that introduces the following interesting information:
For me the interesting part of the story is the ever-evolving “coed”. I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services,  she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old,  NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.
Though there aren’t links in the original post to the content mentioned, a little digging shows that it’s all true. Fluke has described herself as a third year law student at Georgetown University, and indeed, that is what she is. However, contrary to the narrative of innocent victimhood that portrays Fluke as a wide-eyed 23-year-old girl caught without contraception on a college campus full of predatory men, Fluke herself is really a 30-year-old women‘s rights activist who not only didn’t get caught without contraception at Georgetown, but specifically knew the university didn’t cover it and chose to attendfor precisely that reason.
First, there‘s the matter of Fluke’s age. In a segment on Fluke’s battle with Rush Limbaugh, MSNBC reporter Anne Williams called Fluke “the 23-year-old Georgetown law student, prohibited from testifying.” Yet Fluke’s own Linkedin profile reveals a more mature woman:
Sandra Fluke Is Really 30 Years Old And Went to Georgetown Knowing Contraception Wasnt Covered
In fact, according to that profile, she graduated from college in 2003. Barring Fluke being a child prodigy who somehow graduated college at the age of 15, this would make her at least 30 years old:
Sandra Fluke Is Really 30 Years Old And Went to Georgetown Knowing Contraception Wasnt CoveredIt‘s worth noting the massive number of women’s issues groups Fluke was involved in, even while in college.
Now, to be fair, Fluke’s age could have been misreported by the media. Most 3rd year law students are at least 25, and they could have confused her for being an undergraduate senior rather than a 3rd year law student.
The idea that Fluke is herself an unwitting victim of Georgetown’s policy on contraceptives is another matter entirely. In several interviews, especially following Rush Limbaugh’s attack, Fluke has implicitly included herself in the group of women who allegedly unwittingly suffer as a result of Georgetown’s policies. This is a key point for the Democrats supporting her, for if Fluke did happen to read Georgetown’s insurance policy before coming and decide to come anyway, that would, at best, undermine her spokeswoman status.
But what if she not only decided to attend the university anyway, but decided to attend specifically so she could fight this battle? Consider this passage from an early Washington Post story done on Flukebefore she was permitted to testify:
Fluke came to Georgetown University interested in contraceptive coverage: She researched the Jesuit college’s health plans for students before enrolling, and found that birth control was not included. “I decided I was absolutely not willing to compromise the quality of my education in exchange for my health care,” says Fluke, who has spent the past three years lobbying the administration to change its policy on the issue. The issue got the university president’s office last spring, where Georgetown declined to change its policy.
Fluke says she would have used the hearing to talk about the students at Georgetown that don’t have birth control covered, and what that’s meant for them. “I wanted to be able to share their stories,” she says. “My testimony would have been about women who have been affected by their policy, who have medical needs and have suffered dire consequences.. . .The committee did not get to hear real stories I had to share, about actual women who have been dramatically affected by this policy.”
That’s right. It seems Fluke intentionally chose to go to Georgetown so she could agitate and sway them to cover contraceptives. She then went to a hearing as a representative of women who hadn‘t known about Georgetown’s policy until it was too late. Unsympathetic observers might liken this to James O’Keefe attending a hearing to speak against ACORN on behalf of pimps. It certainly raises the question of why the women Fluke claims to speak for couldn’t present their stories for themselves.
Indeed, in a video made after she was denied the opportunity to testify, Fluke raises two “stories” from women who had emailed her, supposedly about their non-sex-related need of contraceptive medicine. She does not identify the emailers by name, or even by school, saying simply that they are students at an unnamed Catholic University:

If Fluke’s stories are real, many will likely call on her to let the women who sent them speak for themselves and stop hogging the spotlight, given that she did choose to attend Georgetown knowing full well what its policy was on contraceptives, and with every indication of being willing to risk the price tag — whether that price tag would be $3000 over 3 years or not.