March 14, 2012


Fluke Limbaugh fallout: Carbonite now Kryptonite for investors


Advertiser's grandstanding fails to pay dividends.Photo: AP
WASHINGTON, March 13, 2012 – Taking political cheap shots at conservatives is fun for both the usual perps and the preening media talking heads that adore them. But in the dollars-and-cents world of business, stunting like this can and does backfire. Take for example last week’s Rush Limbaugh/Sandra Fluke free contraception kerfuffle. It’s ultimate outcome failed to play out the way at least one of Rush’s former sponsors—Internet backup/security company Carbonite—had imagined it would.
Last week, after El Rushbo’s intemperate on-air characterization of Ms. Fluke, The Daily Callerreported that advertiser Carbonite’s “CEO David Friend released a statement on his company’s website declaring that Carbonite had decided to ‘withdraw’ advertising from Rush Limbaugh’s radio show in the wake of his controversial remarks involving Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke because it will ‘ultimately contribute to a more civilized public discourse.’”
Rush Limbaugh.
Rush Limbaugh withstands the latest attack. (Credit: AP.)
Mr. Friend’s ostensibly bold gesture was a big hit with the moveon.org aficionados who’d been flooding the internet and the Twitterverse with demands that advertisers dump Mr. Limbaugh, as a way of eliminating his long-running, highly influential show from the radio airwaves.
Legal Insurrection’s William Jacobson wryly observed, “There are few things that cannot wait for Monday morning, yet Carbonite issued its statement on a Saturday night, in what appears to be a matter of executives’ personal and political opinions outweighing shareholder interests.”
Mr. Friend also let the Maharushi have it via Facebook (hat tip Riehl World View):
“No one with daughters the age of Sandra Fluke, and I have two, could possibly abide the insult and abuse heaped upon this courageous and well-intentioned young lady. Mr. Limbaugh, with his highly personal attacks on Miss Fluke, overstepped any reasonable bounds of decency.”
President Obama chimed in last week as well, seeking also to shelter his own two daughters from the evil machinations of Mr. Limbaugh’s Excellence In Broadcasting (EIB) network. Left unsaid by both the President and Mr. Friend (and their daughters by extension) was why both men were MIA last year when left-wing TV personality Bill Maher savaged Sarah Palin, deploying both the c--- word and the t--- word. Mr. Maher, no doubt, was operating within the “reasonable bounds of decency.” No problem for the daughters there.
In the current case, Mr. Friend misunderestimated the business consequences that can result from this kind of hypocritical political stunting. Carbonite’s stock (ticker symbol CARB) promptly tanked after he undertook his grand weekend proclamations.
Carbonite went public in an IPO last August, pricing its initial offering at $10 per share. This was somewhat lower than original market expectations, perhaps due in part to last summer’s market turmoil. Nonetheless, CARB was initially lofted by the usual high-tech thermals, quickly soaring to $21.10 before commencing its steady, ongoing dive into oblivion.
Prior to the Limbaugh flap, CARB had already retreated this year to slightly below its IPO offering price. Since then, it’s continued its downward cascade, closing today at $8.05 per share, roughly a 20% drop pre-Limbaugh/Fluke and a nearly 60% drop from its 2011 peak.
Carbonite chart, 030612.
CARB drops like a stone after cutting its advertising ties to the Rush Limbaugh show. (Chart: March 6, 2012, Yahoo! business.)
The lesson here: any small-cap company needs to be wary of giving any opening to its competition. In Carbonite’s case, the competition is considerable.
According to Prof. Jacobson, Carbonite’s direct competition “includes Prosoftnet, CrashPlan, Mozy (a division of VMWare, VMW), Symantec's (SYMC) Norton Online Backup, McAfee Online Backup (a division of Intel, INTC), SOS Online Backup, and others.”
In other words, in the networking world, little Carbonite is already battling seriously deep-pocketed mid-to-large cap corporations for its share of the Internet backup business. Perhaps this is one reason why its shares have made little headway since its IPO. Friend’s boneheaded PR decision simply made matters worse for his hapless stockholders.
So why did Mr. Friend go off the deep end on this political issue? The answer, perhaps, lies in his longstanding liberal political leanings. Accuracy in Media (AIM) notes that Mr. Friend has a certain fondness for George Soros-funded entities when it comes to making political contributions. 
In the past, according to AIM, Mr. Friend has donated generously to the Howard Dean, John Kerry, and Barack Obama presidential campaigns. He’s sent money to “America Coming Together,” moveon.org, and “Texans for Truth” as well. This latter entity, “a so-called 527 group funded by George Soros through Moveon.org, released a TV ad accusing Bush of evading his National Guard service. One day later,” AIM adds, “on September 8, [Dan] Rather and CBS[‘] 60 Minutes did their program based on the bogus National Guard documents.” 
America’s so-called liberals are in reality armchair faux-socialists with Stalinist tendencies. Their instinctive approach toward individuals whose opinion they don’t like is to try to silence, either by agitating for an advertiser boycott (as in an earlier case involving Don Imus) or by smearing and slandering their target into oblivion, à la Sarah Palin.
When such an effort is mounted, the deviant voices in the blogosphere and the Twitter-verse go nuts, and the game is afoot. Monied types—ranging from movie stars to rock stars to the occasional wealthy CEO—then feel safe joining the scrum, chiming in with their insincere two cents’ worth to score publicity points. It’s all meant to draw admiring cooing and plaudits from the raging proletariat, insulating these hypocrites from being identified too closely with their obvious status as members of the wealthy 1%.
But this longstanding free ride may be coming to an end in 2012, at least when it comes to jeopardizing one company’s bottom line.
In the case of Carbonite, the company is inexorably losing more and more of the considerable revenue it once generated by advertising on the Rush Limbaugh show. Limbaugh supporters are canceling their Carbonite subscriptions as they “move on” to competitors’ Internet security products. 
Back at the EIB ranch, Mr. Limbaugh is sitting pretty. He remains largely undamaged just a week after his final defeat was pronounced by the left. Prof. Jacobson notes that, ironically, fewer actual Limbaugh advertisers have left him than the moveon types have claimed.
With possibly one exception, all Mr. Limbaugh’s stations and his network have stuck with him. He continues to sign up new advertisers eager to reach his large, well-educated audience—an audience that’s more than happy to consider purchasing products and services he recommends.
As for Carbonite. It’s no longer on the Limbaugh advertiser list. Its stock and its stockholders are collectively getting a swirly. The left is fond of saying that all politics is personal. But for Carbonite, Mr. Friend's personal politics clearly haven’t proved to be very good for business.
Read more of Terry's news and reviews at Curtain Up! in the Entertain Us neighborhood of the Washington. For Terry's investing insights, visit his Communities column, The Prudent Man in Politics.

March 11, 2012


CATHOLIC LEADERS READ LETTER CONDEMNING PRO-GAY MARRIAGE LAW TO 2,500 CHURCHES IN ENGLAND

Catholic Church in England Reads Anti Gay Marriage LetterLONDON (The Blaze/AP) — The Catholic Church in England intensified its campaign against government plans to legalize same-sex marriage Sunday, urging the faithful to protect the “true meaning” of matrimony for future generations.
In a letter read in 2,500 parish churches across the country during Sunday Mass, the church’s senior archbishops argued that the proposed change would reduce the significance of marriage.
“The law helps to shape and form social and cultural values. A change in the law would gradually and inevitably transform society’s understanding of the purpose of marriage,” Archbishop Vincent Nichols and Archbishop Peter Smith said in the letter.
“There would be no recognition of the complementarity of male and female or that marriage is intended for the procreation and education of children,” they wrote.
Catholic Church in England Reads Anti Gay Marriage Letter
The archbishops ended the letter by calling on Catholics to fulfill their duty to make sure “the true meaning of marriage is not lost for future generations.”
Britain’s government plans to allow everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation, to have the option of a civil marriage. Prime Minister David Cameron has openly backed the plans, and the equalities minister will launch a consultation later this month on how to change the legal definition of marriage to include same-sex couples.
Human rights activists said the Catholics’ opposition amounted to discrimination.
“They want the law to discriminate against gay couples. Discrimination is not a Christian value,” said gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell.
Below, watch Archbishop Vincent Nichols of the Diocese of Westminster reading the controversial letter:
Currently only heterosexual couples are permitted to get married in Britain, while civil partnerships, introduced in 2005, are limited to same-sex couples.
Catholic Church in England Reads Anti Gay Marriage Letter
The archbishops’ message came after Pope Benedict XVI on Friday denounced what he called the “powerful” gay marriage lobby in America and told visiting U.S. bishops to not back down in the face of “powerful political and cultural currents seeking to alter the legal definition of marriage.”
Last week Keith O’Brien, the head of the Scottish Catholic Church, condemned the British marriage proposals as “madness,“ and accused the coalition government of trying to ”redefine reality.”

March 9, 2012



PROOF SHE SMOKES CRACK! SHE IS NUTS. SOMEONE NEEDS TO PUT HER IN A PADDED ROOM.


Gloria Allred seeks Rush Limbaugh prosecution

Attorney Gloria Allred is shown. | AP Photo
Allred said he 'engaged in unwarranted, tasteless and exceptionally damaging attacks.' | AP Photo
Rush Limbaugh has drawn the ire of celebrity lawyer Gloria Allred, who sent a letter to the Palm Beach County state attorney requesting an investigation into whether the popular radio host should be prosecuted for calling a law student a “slut” and “prostitute” last week.
“Mr. Limbaugh targeted his attack on a young law student who was simply exercised her free speech and her right to testify before congress on a very important issue to millions of American women and he vilified her. He defamed her and engaged in unwarranted, tasteless and exceptionally damaging attacks on her,” Allred told POLITICO Friday afternoon. “He needs to face the consequences of his conduct in every way that is meaningful.”

Text Size

  • -
  • +
  • reset
In a letter dated March 8, Allred, writing on behalf of the Women’s Equal Rights Legal Defense and Education Fund, requested that Palm Beach County State Attorney Michael McAuliffe probe whether the conservative radio personality had violated Section 836.04 of the Florida Statutes by calling Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke the two derogatory words.
The statute stipulates that anyone who “speaks of and concerning any woman, married or unmarried, falsely and maliciously imputing to her a want of chastity” is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree. Allred explained that the statute recently came to her attention as having never been repealed, and that it could very well apply to Limbaugh’s remarks as his show is broadcast from West Palm Beach.
It is now entirely up to the prosecutor to exercise his discretion on whether there will be a prosecution. McAuliffe did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Allred, whose most recent high-profile clients have included Sharon Bialek, who accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment, and porn star Ginger Lee, who exchanged explicit emails with former Rep. Anthony Weiner, said Friday that she has not yet been in touch with Fluke.
“I don’t reach out to women, they reach rout to me,” she said. “If she did reach out to me, obviously I would respond.”
Limbaugh’s contentious remarks, made against Fluke for testifying on Capitol Hill about women’s access to contraception, resulted in widespread public outrage and dozens of advertisers pulling their commercials from his three-hour program.
“I understand why sponsors are abandoning Mr. Limbaugh in droves,” Allred said. “I think sponsors that remain with him are supporting him and providing commercial dollars to him and his program, condoning what he said.”
She added, “Hitting him economically is one price that he has to pay. He needs to be accountable in every way possible.”


Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73829.html#ixzz1ofOkYba2

March 8, 2012


Thursday, March 8, 2012

Priceless: Rush Limbaugh tells advertiser with 'sellers remorse' to take a hike

Sleep train pulled their ads from Rush Limbaugh's show after the Sandra Fluke hoopla. They quickly realized their mistake and attempted to reunite with Limbaugh. He politely told them to take a hike.
Rush Limbaugh has rejected an advertiser’s apparent attempt to reunite with his show after the company initially dropped its ads from the program following his remarks about contraception advocate Sandra Fluke.

The company, Sleep Train, calls itself “the No. 1 Bedding Specialist on the West Coast, and most recognized mattress retailer in the region.”

In an email to Sleep Train President Dale Carlsen (obtained by The Blaze), a representative of the show says that Limbaugh personally considered the company’s request, but denied it considering its public comments following the controversy.

“Thank you for your requests last week and this week to restart your voiced endorsement in local markets of The Rush Limbaugh Show,” the email begins. “Rush received your requests personally.”

“Unfortunately, your public comments were not well received by our audience, and did not accurately portray either Rush Limbaugh’s character or the intent of his remarks. Thus, we regret to inform you that Rush will be unable to endorse Sleep Train in the future.