November 2, 2012


THE INTERESTING THING WE FOUND SURROUNDING OBAMA’S GRADES IN COLLEGE

This article is a contribution by freelance writer Charles C. Johnson.
Few issues arouse so much interest as Barack Obama’s grades. Everyone from Jodi Kantor, columnist for the New York Times, to David Maraniss of the Washington Post to Donald Trump has weighed in on what they are or might be. Despite the interest, however, we still don’t know what they are — Obama has not yet released his academic records from Occidental (1979-1981), Columbia (1981-1983), or Harvard Law School (1988-1991).
Theories abound as to why, but one that has largely been ignored is that maybe they’re hidden because they reveal Barack Obama was entirely average. How so? New research into the Occidental and Columbia archives by TheBlaze shows that Obama transferred from Occidental during a time of rampant grade inflation and entered Columbia during one of the easiest years to transfer in recent memory.
Newspaper accounts from Occidental show grade inflation was rampant for the years 1977-1981, the year that Barack Obama transferred to Columbia. It was so bad that, according to the student newspaper at the time, the dean of faculty had to intervene in the fall of 1981. (Barack Obama transferred in the spring of 1981 as a sophomore, meaning he would have enrolled.)
Grade Inflation Could Explain How Obama Got Into Columbia
A cartoon from the Occidental newspaper at the time mocks the rampant grade inflation at the school.
During that five-year period, “average GPAs ran 3.11, 3.07, 3.01, 3.08 and 3.08, respectively,” wrote Michael Bruce Abelson for The Occidental on February 19, 1982. “A statistical study by Dean of Faculty James England printed in this month’s [February] edition of the Faculty Newsletter, assails the college’s rising grade point average and makes a direct appeal to faculty members to reconsider the basis upon which grades are given.”
To put these high GPAs in perspective, consider that were Occidental College’s entire student population to apply to Columbia College in ’81, half would have had sufficient GPAs to be admitted at the New York Ivy League school.
The only reason that is possible, however, is because Columbia’s transfer student standards during that same period were very low. At Columbia, the quality of the transfer student had declined so much so that the average admitted transfer student’s GPA was a meager 3.0 and the average SAT score an 1100 (out of a possible 1600).
Jeremy Feldman, a student newspaper writer at Columbia, documented the lower standards in a Nov. 18, 1981 and quoted admissions officials: “On paper at least, the quality of the students accepted [as transfers] has declined along with the number of applicants, the officials say.” (Columbia Spectator, “Tight Housing Discourages Transfer Applications to CC)
Feldman, quoting Robert Boatti, Assistant Dean of Admissions, as well as the former college Dean Arnold Collery, continued:
Boatti also attributed the drop in transfer application to the College’s policy of requiring transfer students to take courses in its core curriculum and to the limited availability of financial aid for them.
He added a “majority” of the transfers come here from college in the New York area. Many come from community colleges, rather than the nation’s top schools.
In grades and other indicators of academic performance, the crop of transfer applicants “doesn’t stand out the way they did before,” [Dean Arnold] Collery said.
Boatti confirmed Dean Collery’s observations:
Among accepted transfer students, the average combined math and verbal score on the Scholastic Aptitude Test is a 1,100 and their grade-point average at their former schools is about 3.0, Boatti said.
The freshman class at the College had a combined SAT score more than 100 points higher.
Only 450 students applied to transfer to Columbia in 1981 and sixty-seven were admitted, according to the Columbia Spectator, compared to 650 applicants just four years before.
Interestingly, Obama’s GPA may not have mattered to get into Columbia at all.
“GPAs were dropped from student transcripts [at Occidental] during the late 1960s, in an effort to de-emphasis grades and stress learning for its own sake,” wrote Arpie Balekjian in the student newspaper, The Occidental on March 13, 1981.  On March 11, 1981, Occidental’s faculty voted to reestablish GPAs on transcripts, but by then, Obama had already filled out an application to transfer to Columbia and been accepted. Impossible though it may seem, he may very well have been admitted to Columbia without ever having to reveal his grades.
And that may not be far-fetched considering Columbia’s lower standards at the time, which were in part fueled by a housing crunch that forced the college to lower standards in order to attract transfer students.
Barack Obama did not graduate with honors at Columbia and so his acolytes make much of his time at Harvard where he was president of the Harvard Law Review and where he graduatedmagna cum laude. Many ignore that his magna cum laude honors may well not been magna cum laude today. Under the system in place when Obama was a student,  only one third of a graduating class did not receive honors. For the class of ’95, a whopping 71.3 percent of the student body graduated with honors, doubling the number of students graduating with honors since 1972 and tripling the numbers receiving magna cum laude. Receiving magna cum laude may be impressive, but it is less so, if one in six students win it.
Eventually the Harvard Law faculty voted overwhelmingly to make it harder to get honors, a policy change that cut the number of students graduating with honors in half, according to The Harvard Law Record, a student newspaper of Harvard Law School.  Under the old system, all students had to do was reach a GPA cutoff. Given the stiff competition, professors felt pressure to inflate the grades of their favorite students. Under the new system, only the top ten percent of students received magna cum laude.  (Victoria Kuohung, “Class of ’99 May Find Honors Harder to Earn,” Harvard Law Record, February 16, 1996).
What does this all mean? Ultimately, given the grade inflation of the time at all three institutions Obama attended, the larger story isn’t about Barack Obama’s grades, but his courses and the radical professors who taught them.
SCIENCE

BEFORE-AND-AFTER PHOTOS OF SANDY’S DESTRUCTION OF THE JERSEY SHORELINE

When something is so large that it can be seen from space, it’s fairly safe to say that it’s a big deal. What Sandy did to the Jersey Shore officially qualifies as a big deal.
So, it was only a matter of time before someone collected satellite photos of the devastation caused by Sandy. ZeroHedge.com has gathered a number of photos to show the contrast. In the first photo, you can see the dramatic change to the New Jersey beach after Sandy left town.
Satellite Photos Show Before and After of Hurricane Sandy
Image: Weather Matrix / AccuWeather.com
Just 67 miles south of New York City is Mantoloking, NJ. According to the 2010 Census, this tiny seaside borough was home to fewer than 300 people, all who remain under a mandatory evacuation order. When that order is lifted, many of those folks may not find a home to return to.
Here’s what Mantoloking looked like before this past weekend:
Satellite Photos Show Before and After of Hurricane Sandy
And this is what that same neighborhood looks like today. Notice that the storm’s power broke through the barrier island on which Mantoloking sits, allowing the Atlantic Ocean to join with theBarnegat Bay.
Satellite Photos Show Before and After of Hurricane Sandy
Further down the New Jersey coastline is Atlantic City. On Tuesday night, the center of the massive storm made landfall very close to Atlantic City on Tuesday night around 6pm. Here’s Atlantic City’s “before” shot.
Satellite Photos Show Before and After of Hurricane Sandy
And here is what the satellites captured after the storm.
Satellite Photos Show Before and After of Hurricane Sandy
The Associated Press has also jumped on the “before and after” bandwagon
Satellite Photos Show Before and After of Hurricane Sandy
Image: AP
To see Zero Hedge’s extensive collection of before and after Jersey shore shots, click HERE.
(H/T: Zero Hedge / NOAA)
I live just outside of Philadelphia. I have not had power for 5 days now because of Hurricane Sandy.

I have lots to say about this whole process and once I can gather my thoughts I will post them here.

I thank God tonight to have power, heat and light tonight!

October 25, 2012


EVIL Spookydude George Soros Heir's Village Townhouse Listed for $29.5 Million

A mid-19th century four-story townhouse on West 10th Street was listed yesterday for $29,500,000. The 21 room (7BR, 8.5BA), 26-foot wide house waspurchased by Andrea Soros Colombel, daughter of billionaire George Soros, in 2006 for $11,500,000 and given a thorough renovating. The finished product features triple exposures on every floor, three wood burning fireplaces, and an extremely solid red room (red rooms are especially delightful when they seem to have no intended purpose whatsoever other than being very red) as well as an elevator, fitness room, and state-of-the-art sound and security systems. Unfortunately, no floorplan is provided, but the pictures are fun enough for the time being.
· Listing: 10 West 10th Street [Corcoran]

October 16, 2012


Remarks by the President on the Deaths of U.S. Embassy Staff in Libya

Rose Garden
10:43 A.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT:  Good morning.  Every day, all across the world, American diplomats and civilians work tirelessly to advance the interests and values of our nation.  Often, they are away from their families.  Sometimes, they brave great danger.
Yesterday, four of these extraordinary Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Benghazi.  Among those killed was our Ambassador, Chris Stevens, as well as Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith.  We are still notifying the families of the others who were killed.  And today, the American people stand united in holding the families of the four Americans in our thoughts and in our prayers.
The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack.  We're working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats.  I've also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world.  And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people.
Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths.  We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.  But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence.  None.  The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts.
Already, many Libyans have joined us in doing so, and this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya.  Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans.  Libyans helped some of our diplomats find safety, and they carried Ambassador Stevens’s body to the hospital, where we tragically learned that he had died.
It's especially tragic that Chris Stevens died in Benghazi because it is a city that he helped to save.  At the height of the Libyan revolution, Chris led our diplomatic post in Benghazi.  With characteristic skill, courage, and resolve, he built partnerships with Libyan revolutionaries, and helped them as they planned to build a new Libya.  When the Qaddafi regime came to an end, Chris was there to serve as our ambassador to the new Libya, and he worked tirelessly to support this young democracy, and I think both Secretary Clinton and I relied deeply on his knowledge of the situation on the ground there.  He was a role model to all who worked with him and to the young diplomats who aspire to walk in his footsteps.
Along with his colleagues, Chris died in a country that is still striving to emerge from the recent experience of war. Today, the loss of these four Americans is fresh, but our memories of them linger on.  I have no doubt that their legacy will live on through the work that they did far from our shores and in the hearts of those who love them back home.
Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks.  We mourned with the families who were lost on that day.  I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed.  And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi. 
As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it.  Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.
No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.  Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.  We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act.  And make no mistake, justice will be done.
But we also know that the lives these Americans led stand in stark contrast to those of their attackers.  These four Americans stood up for freedom and human dignity.  They should give every American great pride in the country that they served, and the hope that our flag represents to people around the globe who also yearn to live in freedom and with dignity.
We grieve with their families, but let us carry on their memory, and let us continue their work of seeking a stronger America and a better world for all of our children.
Thank you.  May God bless the memory of those we lost and may God bless the United States of America.
END
10:48 A.M. EDT

October 8, 2012



GET OUR TOP STORIES

FOLLOW JEZEBEL

The Return of Kony 2012 Mastermind Jason Russell, Now With 80% Less Psychosis

Invisible Children co-founder and Kony 2012 director Jason Russell, fresh out of the hospital from his highly-publicized nervous breakdown, was back in finger-snapping glory when he sat down with Oprah yesterday to talk about his meltdown and his new campaign. (But mostly about his meltdown.) Russell's not exactly sure what went wrong, but he does know that he was a victim of the media — and Invisible Children's new campaign focuses more on Russell's hardships than on those of Africa's "invisible children."

Why Did Russell Make the Kony 2012 Video?

Sure, Russell was inspired by big words such as injustice, inaction, Africa, etc. But he was also inspired by Oprah. "To be honest, truly, your master class changed my life," he told her. "You're kidding," she responded, looking slightly sick. With great power comes great responsibility!
Later, she recovered enough to give Russell props for exposing all of the previously invisible children of Africa. "What I think is so admirable about Invisible Children is that you all have brought to the forefront, have made the world acknowledge, that yes life does matter," she said— right before asking Russell a ton of questions about whether he's gay and if he was masturbating on that fateful, sunny San Diego day.

So What About Those Gay Rumors, Anyway?


Oprah reminded Russell that his heterosexuality was challenged after he ran around naked in the street. (Yes, that is the only reason.) "I've heard those rumors," Russell laughed:
"In the video I'm snapping my finger up and down...I grew up in theater... I am animated. I am theatrical. And that's me by nature. So When you take me and times it by 10... I don't know what was in my head, but it was controlling my body and making me do really strange things."
Maybe his body was possessed by the spirit of Bob Fosse?

Wasn't He Masturbating?

Maybe. Possibly. It would make sense. "There were rumors of masturbation but no one who was there ever said that that was happening," Russell said. "Masturbation is...I'm naked so it's not a far extension of imagination that that would be happening. But no, I don't remember any of that."

So What Does He Remember?

Russell remembers "flipping off cars," running around trees, and stopping cars by laying in the street, but that he doesn't remember why he took his clothes off because that person was not the real him. He said he started running around outside because he became convinced he had to get back to New York in the next 12 hours. "That's what I thought, because I have to stop the war...I think I was trying to ask cars to take me to the airport. In my underwear."

But Why Did He Have the Breakdown in the First Place?

Russell attributed his meltdown to his newfound star power and a website that he says "cut" him:
"It was so high, I kept thinking wow and then it was like you're the worst. You're terrible. The thing that got my mind spinning is these powerful people in the world are looking to you for what's next. That made me feel alone. It also made me feel like I had to have the answer to the future. I thought oh my God, the U.N. (United Nations) is contacting us."
He expanded on this point on Today:
"My mind couldn't stop thinking about the future. I literally thought I was responsible for the future of humanity. It started to go into a point where my mind finally turned against me and there was a moment where, click, I was not in control of my mind or my body.''

When Did He (in Oprah's Words) "Come Back to Himself"?

It took two weeks for him to snap out of his media-induced psychosis. "I thought people were trying to kill me, so I wouldn't take any medicine," he said. "I didn't really trust anyone."

What Natural Disaster was the rise of #Kony2012 Most Like?

A tsunami. Russell said his team wasn't prepared for the onslaught of attention and that the only time they celebrated was after a million views. "Everyone felt it," he said. "It was like, 'what have we done?'"

What's the Deal with Invisible Children's New Video (Released Last Night), MOVE?

If Kony 2012 was a tsunami, MOVE is like a lukewarm wading pool.
"MOVE is a behind-the-scenes look at the viral video KONY 2012, the organization behind it, and the movement that made Joseph Kony famous," Invisible Children explains. "You can lead or you can follow, but eventually everyone will have to MOVE."
Oh, how Invisible Children loves flashy, vague buzzwords. I (am probably the only person who) watched the entire 30-minute video. Here are some of my notes:
  • "The Kony 2012 experiment will reach its peak on November 17" — hey, whatever happened to "Take Back the Night?"/that poster party thing on 4/20? Wasn't that supposed to be the peak?
  • Then there is a metaphor about a slinky and a lot of YouTube clips of people calling millennials lazy.
  • "This is a story about a group of millennials around the world trying to do something big."
  • Lots of dancing.
  • This is basically just a recap of everything that happened to Invisible Children over the past six months. A loooong recap. Interesting how they filmed so many emotional conversations...almost as if they planned to use this "behind the scenes" footage one day! Or as if they were auditioning for The Real Non-Profit Housewives.
  • Here's a bullshitty brainstorming sesh, practically a parody of itself:
    lmost 20 minutes in and we're still talking about how the personal attacks against Russell were unfair. Blah blah mean blogs and pundits, blah blah no one understood them. Way more air time devoted to Russell than to Kony at this point. Seriously though, why did they film Russell crying? See below:

  • ALL of the (English-speaking!) black people in this documentary have subtitles when they're speaking. It's bothering me.
  • We don't find out what the big plan is until 28:55! Basically, we're all going to meet in DC on November 17th and convince 10 international leaders to meet and "activate the arrest of Joseph Kony." As you can see in the screenshot below, they've assigned all of the countries numbers re: how many representatives they need. Like Risk? #Gamification #Kony2012 #MOVE #Wooooo!
    The Return of Kony 2012 Mastermind Jason Russell, Now With 80% Less Psychosis
  • So How, Exactly, Is Any of This Really Different From Last Time?

    It's not. Did you think it would be? Sure, more people are aware that Joseph Kony exists. (And that Jason Russell is unstable.) But soundbites about "awareness" from Nicholas Kristof don't actually equal action — or, at least, they haven't yet. Even MOVE admits Kony is still abducting people without much pushback. But what about all of those Facebook shares?!?
    We've said it before, and we'll say it again: there are better ways to give back globally. Try our handy five-step guide to effective philanthropy!

    How's the Whole "Oversimplification" Strategy Working Out for Russell This Time Around?