July 7, 2016

James Comey's baffling testimony (2)

(Scott Johnson) I found several points in FBI Director Comey's testimony today (and his statement on Tuesday) baffling. I only saw parts of his testimony today; if I missed any of these points, please forgive me. Here are a few points baffle me. The imposition of an elemnt of specific intent on section 793(f). Where did this come from? Comey elaborated on this in his opening statement. I found it utterly unpersuasive.

Source: Power LinePower Line